#ifndef RANGECHECK_H #define RANGECHECK_H #include #include /* return 0 for range error / overflow, 1 for ok */ #if defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__OPTIMIZE__) && !defined(__clang__) #define __static extern #else #define __static static #endif /* does ptr point to one of buf[0], buf[1], ... buf[len-1]? */ __static inline int range_ptrinbuf(const void* buf,size_t len,const void* ptr) { register const char* c=(const char*)buf; /* no pointer arithmetic on void* */ return (c && /* is buf non-NULL? */ ((uintptr_t)c)+len>(uintptr_t)c && /* gcc 4.1 miscompiles without (uintptr_t) */ /* catch integer overflows and fail if buffer is 0 bytes long */ /* because then ptr can't point _in_ the buffer */ (uintptr_t)((const char*)ptr-c)=Min && ptr=(uintptr_t)buf); } /* same thing but buffer is given as pointer to first byte (Min) and * pointer beyond last byte (Max). Again, an 0-size buffer is valid. */ __static inline int range_validbuf2(const void* Min,const void* Max) { return (Min && Max>=Min); } /* is buf2[0..len2-1] inside buf1[0..len-1]? */ __static inline int range_bufinbuf(const void* buf1,size_t len1,const void* buf2,size_t len2) { return range_validbuf(buf1,len1) && range_validbuf(buf2,len2) && buf1<=buf2 && (ptrdiff_t)buf1+len1>=(ptrdiff_t)buf2+len2; } /* does an array of "elements" members of size "membersize" starting at * "arraystart" lie inside buf1[0..len-1]? */ int range_arrayinbuf(const void* buf,size_t len, const void* arraystart,size_t elements,size_t membersize); /* does an ASCIIZ string starting at "ptr" lie in buf[0..len-1]? */ int range_strinbuf(const void* buf,size_t len,const void* stringstart); /* does an UTF-16 string starting at "ptr" lie in buf[0..len-1]? */ int range_str2inbuf(const void* buf,size_t len,const void* stringstart); /* does an UTF-32 string starting at "ptr" lie in buf[0..len-1]? */ int range_str4inbuf(const void* buf,size_t len,const void* stringstart); /* I originally omitted addition and substraction because it appeared * trivial. You could just add the two numbers and see if it was * smaller than either of them. This always worked for me because I * only cared about unsigned arithmetic, but for signed arithmetic, * adding two numbers is undefined if the result does not fit in the * int. gcc has started to actually use this undefinedness to screw * you. The following code illustrates this: * int a=INT_MAX,b=a+5; * if (b=(__a))?assign(c,__a+__b):1); }) #define sub_of(c,a,b) ({ typeof(a) __a=a; typeof(b) __b=b; (__b)<1?((__MAX(typeof(c))+(__b)>=(__a))?assign(c,__a-__b):1) : ((__MIN(typeof(c))+(__b)<=(__a))?assign(c,__a-__b):1); }) #undef __static #endif