|
|
|
#ifndef RANGECHECK_H
|
|
|
|
#define RANGECHECK_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <inttypes.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <stddef.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* return 0 for range error / overflow, 1 for ok */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__OPTIMIZE__) && !defined(__clang__)
|
|
|
|
#define __static extern
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
#define __static static
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* does ptr point to one of buf[0], buf[1], ... buf[len-1]? */
|
|
|
|
__static inline int range_ptrinbuf(const void* buf,size_t len,const void* ptr) {
|
|
|
|
register const char* c=(const char*)buf; /* no pointer arithmetic on void* */
|
|
|
|
return (c && /* is buf non-NULL? */
|
|
|
|
((uintptr_t)c)+len>(uintptr_t)c && /* gcc 4.1 miscompiles without (uintptr_t) */
|
|
|
|
/* catch integer overflows and fail if buffer is 0 bytes long */
|
|
|
|
/* because then ptr can't point _in_ the buffer */
|
|
|
|
(uintptr_t)((const char*)ptr-c)<len); /* this one is a little tricky.
|
|
|
|
"ptr-c" checks the offset of ptr in the buffer is inside the buffer size.
|
|
|
|
Now, ptr-c can underflow; say it is -1. When we cast it to uintptr_t, it becomes
|
|
|
|
a very large number. */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* same thing, but the buffer is specified by a pointer to the first
|
|
|
|
* byte (Min) and a pointer after the last byte (Max). */
|
|
|
|
__static inline int range_ptrinbuf2(const void* Min,const void* Max,const void* ptr) {
|
|
|
|
return (Min && ptr>=Min && ptr<Max);
|
|
|
|
/* Min <= Max is implicitly checked here */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Is this a plausible buffer?
|
|
|
|
* Check whether buf is NULL, and whether buf+len overflows.
|
|
|
|
* Does NOT check whether buf has a non-zero length! */
|
|
|
|
__static inline int range_validbuf(const void* buf,size_t len) {
|
|
|
|
return (buf && (uintptr_t)buf+len>=(uintptr_t)buf);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* same thing but buffer is given as pointer to first byte (Min) and
|
|
|
|
* pointer beyond last byte (Max). Again, an 0-size buffer is valid. */
|
|
|
|
__static inline int range_validbuf2(const void* Min,const void* Max) {
|
|
|
|
return (Min && Max>=Min);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* is buf2[0..len2-1] inside buf1[0..len-1]? */
|
|
|
|
__static inline int range_bufinbuf(const void* buf1,size_t len1,const void* buf2,size_t len2) {
|
|
|
|
return range_validbuf(buf1,len1) &&
|
|
|
|
range_validbuf(buf2,len2) &&
|
|
|
|
buf1<=buf2 &&
|
|
|
|
(ptrdiff_t)buf1+len1>=(ptrdiff_t)buf2+len2;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* does an array of "elements" members of size "membersize" starting at
|
|
|
|
* "arraystart" lie inside buf1[0..len-1]? */
|
|
|
|
int range_arrayinbuf(const void* buf,size_t len,
|
|
|
|
const void* arraystart,size_t elements,size_t membersize);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* does an ASCIIZ string starting at "ptr" lie in buf[0..len-1]? */
|
|
|
|
int range_strinbuf(const void* buf,size_t len,const void* stringstart);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* does an UTF-16 string starting at "ptr" lie in buf[0..len-1]? */
|
|
|
|
int range_str2inbuf(const void* buf,size_t len,const void* stringstart);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* does an UTF-32 string starting at "ptr" lie in buf[0..len-1]? */
|
|
|
|
int range_str4inbuf(const void* buf,size_t len,const void* stringstart);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* I originally omitted addition and substraction because it appeared
|
|
|
|
* trivial. You could just add the two numbers and see if it was
|
|
|
|
* smaller than either of them. This always worked for me because I
|
|
|
|
* only cared about unsigned arithmetic, but for signed arithmetic,
|
|
|
|
* adding two numbers is undefined if the result does not fit in the
|
|
|
|
* int. gcc has started to actually use this undefinedness to screw
|
|
|
|
* you. The following code illustrates this:
|
|
|
|
* int a=INT_MAX,b=a+5;
|
|
|
|
* if (b<a) abort(); // whole statement optimized away by gcc 4.1
|
|
|
|
* // at this point, b<a
|
|
|
|
* So I decided to add some integer overflow protection functionality
|
|
|
|
* here for addition and subtraction, too. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* usage:
|
|
|
|
* if (add_of(dest,a,b)) return EINVAL; // dest=a+b;
|
|
|
|
* if (sub_of(dest,a,b)) return EINVAL; // dest=a-b;
|
|
|
|
* if (assign(dest,some_int)) return EINVAL; // dest=some_int;
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* two important assumptions:
|
|
|
|
* 1. the platform is using two's complement
|
|
|
|
* 2. there are 8 bits in a byte
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define __HALF_MAX_SIGNED(type) ((type)1 << (sizeof(type)*8-2))
|
|
|
|
#define __MAX_SIGNED(type) (__HALF_MAX_SIGNED(type) - 1 + __HALF_MAX_SIGNED(type))
|
|
|
|
#define __MIN_SIGNED(type) (-1 - __MAX_SIGNED(type))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* we use <1 and not <0 to avoid a gcc warning */
|
|
|
|
#define __MIN(type) ((type)-1 < 1?__MIN_SIGNED(type):(type)0)
|
|
|
|
#define __MAX(type) ((type)~__MIN(type))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define assign(dest,src) ({ typeof(src) __x=(src); typeof(dest) __y=__x; (__x==__y && ((__x<1) == (__y<1))?(void)((dest)=__y),0:1); })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* if a+b is defined and does not have an integer overflow, do c=a+b and
|
|
|
|
* return 0. Otherwise, return 1. */
|
|
|
|
#define add_of(c,a,b) ({ typeof(a) __a=a; typeof(b) __b=b; (__b)<1?((__MIN(typeof(c))-(__b)<=(__a))?assign(c,__a+__b):1) : ((__MAX(typeof(c))-(__b)>=(__a))?assign(c,__a+__b):1); })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define sub_of(c,a,b) ({ typeof(a) __a=a; typeof(b) __b=b; (__b)<1?((__MAX(typeof(c))+(__b)>=(__a))?assign(c,__a-__b):1) : ((__MIN(typeof(c))+(__b)<=(__a))?assign(c,__a-__b):1); })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#undef __static
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|